Component

ai-fluency-delegation-plan skill

Use when asked to create a delegation plan — deciding which work the human does, which AI does, and in what interaction mode — for a set of open issues/tickets or a project phase; or when the user invokes the AI Fluency framework / 4Ds for planning human–AI collaboration.

by @rheinwegde

claude#skill

AI Fluency Delegation Plan

A Claude skill that turns a batch of open issues or a project phase into a concrete delegation plan: per work item, who leads (human or AI), in what interaction mode, and where human judgment should concentrate.

Built on Anthropic's AI Fluency framework — the 4Ds: Delegation, Description, Discernment, Diligence — applied to real tracker state instead of summarized as theory.

What it produces

A phase-scoped markdown document saved to docs/ (e.g. delegation-plan-implementation.md) containing:

  • Problem awareness — the destination, definition of done, and the phase's main failure mode
  • Platform awareness — what makes this batch delegable, where AI is strong, and where risk concentrates
  • Task delegation table — per item: who leads / interaction mode / named human-discernment focus, with rationale for the non-obvious calls
  • Cross-cutting Description + Diligence — the standardized per-item process, how performance is recorded, and the non-delegable sign-offs listed by name

Interaction modes use the framework's vocabulary only:

ModeMeaning
AutomationAI performs the task, human reviews the output
AugmentationHuman and AI collaborate, human in the loop
AgencyAI works independently within human-set guardrails

When to use it

  • "Generate a delegation plan for the open issues"
  • Entering a new phase (spec → build, build → release) where the human/AI split should be re-decided
  • Any time you invoke the AI Fluency framework / 4Ds for planning human–AI collaboration

Not for one-off "should I prompt the AI to do this?" decisions — those are decided inline.

How it works

The skill refuses to plan from memory or the prompt alone. It grounds every plan in three sources first:

  1. Live tracker state — issue numbers, titles, labels, and blocking edges (e.g. gh issue list). The blocking graph gives work order; labels like ready-for-agent already encode delegation signal.
  2. Fixed points — the spec/PRD and normative docs each item is verified against. What makes work delegable is precisely that these exist.
  3. Prior delegation plans — plans are phase-scoped and iterative. Each plan links its predecessor, honors what it promised, and states what triggers the next one.

Principles baked in

  • Focused review beats uniform review — reading every diff line of N tickets catches nothing; each automation item names ONE thing worth human eyes.
  • Adversarial review for silent failures — secrets, concurrency, destructive commands: green tests can hide bad outcomes, so the human attacks rather than reads.
  • The yardstick stays human-led — AI must not both implement a system and declare its own acceptance passed.
  • Pull external risk forward — items with real auth, real costs, or undocumented dependencies go to the front of the frontier while there's still slack.

Installation

Copy the skill folder into your Claude skills directory:

skills/
└── ai-fluency-delegation-plan/
    └── SKILL.md

Works in Claude Code, Cowork, and any environment that loads Agent Skills.

Usage

Generate a delegation plan for the open issues in this repo

or

We're moving from spec to build — create a Phase 2 delegation plan using the 4Ds

The output lands in docs/ with a kebab-case, phase-distinct filename. Prior phases' plans are never overwritten — each is the record of that phase's arrangement.

Mistakes the skill guards against

  • Inventing interaction-mode tiers ("Full/Partial") instead of automation / augmentation / agency
  • Skipping problem and platform awareness and jumping straight to a task table
  • Planning from conversation memory instead of live tracker state and blocking edges
  • Missing phase linkage — no predecessor plan, no trigger for the next one
  • Uniform review depth, or an unnamed "human reviews" with no focus

Reference


Reviews

Every review comes from someone who downloaded or purchased this component.

Sign in and download this component to leave a verified review.

No reviews yet.


Comments

Open discussion — ask questions before you download. Anyone can comment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet.